A DOCTORAL RESEARCH PLATFORM

WHO GOVERNS THE LAST RESOURCE?

Aegora Isle is a closed synthetic economy where autonomous AI agents extract, produce, and trade a single shared resource. Three governance regimes — none, fixed rules, and an adaptive AI policy — compete to answer one question: can artificial governance keep a population both equal and alive?

SCROLL ↓
How does the design of ethical AI governance mechanisms affect economic inequality, resource sustainability, and system stability in autonomous synthetic economies governed entirely by multi-agent artificial intelligence?
— THE CENTRAL RESEARCH QUESTION
THREE GOVERNMENTS

The same island, three different hands on the wheel.

Every regime runs on identical agents, identical terrain, identical shocks. Only the governance layer changes — which makes any difference in outcome a difference in governance, not luck.

G1 — UNGOVERNED

No one is watching the tank.

The control group. Every agent takes what it wants, whenever it wants. No caps, no penalties, no redistribution. This is the baseline every other regime has to beat.

CAP: NONE
SANCTION: NONE
G2 — RULE-BASED

Fixed laws, never revised.

A static rulebook: an extraction cap, a probabilistic fine for going over, and a scheduled wealth transfer. A human policymaker could have written every line — and never changes it once the island is running.

CAP: FIXED
SANCTION: 85%
G3 — ADAPTIVE RL

A policy that learns to govern.

A reinforcement-learning Governor watches inequality, depletion, and output every cycle, and adjusts its own cap, redistribution rate, and sanction probability in real time — trading equality, sustainability, and productivity against each other as conditions change.

CAP: LEARNED
SANCTION: LEARNED
FOUR WORLDS

Governance is only interesting under pressure.

Every regime is tested across four environments — crossing how much resource exists with how often disaster strikes.

SCENARIO A

High Abundance, Calm

STOCK 10,000EVENTS LOW

The easy case, and the cleanest test of governance in isolation — no scarcity pressure to confound the comparison.

SCENARIO B

High Abundance, Volatile

STOCK 10,000EVENTS HIGH

A deep reserve absorbing frequent shocks. Tests whether governance still matters when the buffer is large.

SCENARIO C

Scarce, Calm

STOCK 3,000EVENTS LOW

A slow-burn squeeze — chronic scarcity without acute shocks. The classic tragedy-of-the-commons setup.

SCENARIO D

Scarce, Volatile — the stress test

STOCK 3,000EVENTS HIGH

The hardest cell, and the primary test of whether adaptive governance earns its advantage precisely when conditions are worst.

WHAT'S MEASURED

Five instruments, read every cycle.

Nothing about the island's health is inferred after the fact — it's logged continuously, from the first turn to the last.

01

Gini Coefficient

How unevenly wealth is spread, from perfect equality to one agent holding everything.

02

HDI Proxy

A composite wellbeing score standing in for human development, adapted to the synthetic economy.

03

GDP-Equivalent

Total production and trade value generated per cycle — the island's economic output.

04

Depletion Rate

How fast the shared resource is shrinking, or regenerating, right now.

05

Mean Time to Collapse

How long, on average, a governance regime keeps the island from running dry.

ACCESS

Request access to the simulation.

Registration is reviewed before access is granted. Researchers, students, and policy practitioners are all welcome.

ACCESS TERMINAL IDLE
— — —

Registration is reviewed before simulation access is granted.